Music and Pompeii
Trio
of musicians playing an aulos, cymbala,
and tympanum (mosaic from Pompeii)
There are a
number of mosaics and frescoes at the archaeological
site of Pompeii (and elsewhere) that show musicians
and musical instruments. There are also various
extant examples of
ancient instruments (or reliably reconstructed ones) at
the National Archaeological Museum and elsewhere that
can help us understand the nature of Roman music. Paleo-anything is a tough nut to crack,
particularly ancient speech and ancient music, even
from historic times, such as Greece and Rome; you can
forget the cave-dwellers of Lascaux. I say that even
as I listen to a particularly haunting recreation of
ancient Sumerian and Mesopotamian music, The Flood,
recorded by singer, scholar and composer, Stef Conner.
It certainly gets an E for Effort. An A for
authenticity? No one really knows. I hope so.
To the case at hand, Pompeii. The
museum in Naples has just presented a lecture and
discussion on "Eros and music in Ancient Pompeii." It
was a combination of a look at genuine or
reconstructed Roman instruments in the collection of
the museum, such things as the lyre, the aulos (the
pipe being played by the musician on the left in the
image), and various percussion pieces plus a tour of
the “Secret Room” (joshingly
called the Pornorama); that is, mosaics and frescoes
showing Romans engaged in sexual activities, at least
some of which are accompanied by music. Also seen are
various depictions from ancient Pompeii of music being
performed at banquets, religious rites, funerals,
military displays, pantomine and theater, etc. We know
that Romans cultivated music as a sign of education
and that musicians held a place of honor in the Roman
world. Music contests were quite common and attracted
a wide range of competition, including Nero himself,
who sang publicly in Naples and even traveled to
Greece once to compete.
None of that is surprising. There is a vast
body of literature about music in the ancient world.
Some of it is solid and some is speculative, but
that's all right, too. What is surprising is that a
local paper welcomed the exhibit as finally shedding
light on Roman music; after all, he says, aside from a
brief medieval manuscript or two, the rest is in
darkness. That is just not true. Maybe in deafness,
because you still can't hear the original, but not in
darkness because physical remnants of ancient music
are all over the place, including Pompeii.
Can you extrapolate what the
music might really have sounded like? A bit,
but with great difficulty. In a very broad sense, at
least early Roman musical theory was Greek in
the sense that it was Pythagorean —that is,
based on the relationship of one note (frequency) to
another. In other words, like the Greeks, the Romans
recognized such intervals as the octave and the fifth,
for example. The Romans had read their Plato and knew
the Timaeus dialogue, much of which is a detailed
Pythagorean explanation of the “harmony of the
spheres”. And even very late Roman historians such as
Boethius viewed their music as pretty much of a
cultural descendant of Greek music. (Most Western
music today can still be said to be neo-Pythagorean.)
Nevertheless, “In the Graeco-Roman world we cannot
without danger apply evidence from one part or
period to the whole, and the dividing line between
what is to be called Greek and what Roman in any of
the arts is never quite certain” (from chapter
10, "Roman Music," by John E. Scott, in The New
Oxford History of Music: Ancient and Oriental Music).
Important, too, is the fact that
Roman expansion influenced their music. They had some
music from the Etruscans in Italy, then north Africa
and the Middle East. It's
a safe bet that at least some of that was decidedly
non-Pythagorean. Rome at times must have had quite a few
cross-cultural jam sessions going on. But a display of
instruments and mosaics showing how music was used
socially...and even some musical notation...will provide
little understanding as to what the music sounded like.
Folk music traditions tend to be very stable and you
might get insight into such things as approach to pitch,
vibrato, use of micro-tones, etc. etc., even from long
ago, but it's iffy. I don't mind admitting that this
irritates me. It seems to me that if the ancient Greeks
in the second century BC (!) could build the Antikythera
Mechansim, a sophisticated mechanical
computer that calculated and illustrated astronomical
information, they might have come up with a simple sound
recorder. It's unforgivable! But the museum exhibit was
still worthwhile.
to music portal
to ancient world portal
to top of this page