Temple to Ceres
The ruins of Paestum that you see
today as you drive along the length of SS 18 about fifteen
miles past Battipaglia give only the faintest idea of what
a great Greek city in those days must have been like.
First of all, the area is known—from the discovery of
pottery fragments—to have been visited many centuries
before even the famous Greek city-builders by travelers
from as far east in the Aegean as myth-shrouded Troy. Certainly the Mycenaean
Greeks must have been among these. In any event,
when it came time for Sybarite
settlers—from Sibari, another Greek colony to the south
near modern-day Taranto—to seek greener pastures, they
chose the shores of southern Italy at a point where the Sele river flows into the Tyrrhenian
Sea, the southern part of what is today called the Gulf of
Salerno. Before the Sybarite Greeks arrived, the
area was home to an indigenous people known as the Enotrians. (Their main
settlement, named Tempalta by archaeologists, was 14 km.
to the north of Paestum at the mouth of the Sele.) It
isn't clear whether the Greek takeover of the area was
peaceful or violent.
Temple to Poseidon
The
Greeks founded their city on this fertile plain in
around 600 BC. and named it Poseidonia (after the Greek
god of the sea, the Roman "Neptune"). They didn’t seem to
mind the total absence of any nearby high ground on which
to build an acropolis, the "high city" typical of so many
other Greek settlements. Perhaps the mythology and aura of
magic already linked to the area was a factor in their
decision. Here they built a city, relying on megalithic
walls for defense. The walls were three miles in
circumference, and, indeed, at least the massive lower
portions of the walls are still intact around much of the
perimeter; as well, the ruins of the four gates are still
visible: Porta Aurea, Porta della Giustizia,
Porta della Sirena, and Porta della Marina.
Entrance to
the vast archaeological site is directly from the main
road, SS 18. There are a number of exits marked "Paestum"
leading to various sections of the new town as well as the
archaeological site just a few hundred yards to the west,
between the road and the sea. The most obvious ruins to be
seen are those of three large temples. The southernmost
one is the Doric Basilica; it was probably dedicated to
Hera, wife of Zeus and queen of the Gods; there is a
sacrificial altar in front of the temple. Next to this
temple stands the so-called Temple of Poseidon; its
simply-fluted, heavy columns are the best preserved
examples of classic Greek Doric architecture left in the
world, including ruins in Greece. The third large temple
left standing is the one erected to Ceres. All three of
these are from the sixth century BC.
Perhaps because of its lack of
strategic terrain, Poseidonia had a relatively short
history as a Greek city. It carried on commerce with the
great Etruscan cities of the
north, but then in the fourth century BC was
conquered by the Lucanians,
one of the indigenous Italic
peoples of the peninsula and the one whose name this
region, Lucania, still bears. The Lucanians are referred
to by Strabo as a "Samnitic"
people. If they really were Samnites, even distant
cousins, then they were no doubt nasty and belligerent,
but like everyone else at the time in Italy, they too were
gobbled up in turn by the mighty Romans. The Romans
strengthened the walls of Poseidon—Paestum, by
then— and added baths, more temples and an amphitheater,
turning the place into a typical Roman outpost of
luxurious sybaritic self-indulgence. (That was nice, since
Sybarites had founded the city in the first place.) In any
event, though less conspicuous than the Greek temples,
there are significant Roman ruins to be seen as you stroll
across the wide abandoned meadows of Paestum.
The entire area today shows
remnants of not only the Greek walled city of Paestum and
later Roman ruins, but other smaller sites such as shrines
and necropoli outside the walls; some are Greek and Roman,
but some are Lucanian; and some appear to be Enotrian.
That's not all: the famous Tomb of the Diver has
figurative art on the
inside of the tomb, showing a man diving into the
water (image, right). It is the best-known example of tomb
slab painting in Paestum and part of the site's great
treasure trove of ancient fresco paintings. It is my
understanding that that type of tomb ornamentation is not
Greek but possibly Etruscan. There are just
enough such Etruscan morsels lying around in Paestum to
make archaeologists smack their lips, so who knows.
paragraph below added Oct 2022
Just Time for One Last Swim
Note that
this figure is a tomb slab. It was built with five
large stone slabs, each with a fresco. The diver is on the
ceiling. (That is, it closed like a cigar box. Five local limestone slabs formed the four
lateral walls and the ceiling; the floor excavated in
the natural bedrock. The five slabs, carefully bonded
with plaster, formed a chamber about 215 × 100 × 80 cm (7.1 × 3.3 × 2.6 ft) in
size.) It is one of the most studied
artistic works of antiquity. The scene shows a naked boy
diving from a tower into a body of water, and it is not
clear what this means. Why put this on a man's tomb,
buried underground? It was built around 480 BC and found
by Marco Napoli, an Italian archaeologist, in 1968. There
continue to be debates about which cultural tradition it
comes from: Greek? The earlier Etruscans? What is the
figure of the diver all about? It makes sense to think
it's religious, but how? Is it a metaphor of life as an
interval between birth (the dive) and death (the water)?
Is it a suicide? This is the uncreepiest tomb I have ever
seen. Maybe it's a good bad joke. You know, just time for
one last swim. There are no inscriptions to shed light on
any of this. The mystery remains.
-Illustration appeared in EL
PAĺS, Oct.10 2022
-also see: R. Ross
Holloway. "The Tomb of the Diver", in American
Journal of Archaeology,
Vol. 110, n. 3,
July 2006 (pp.
365–388) (in English).
-Held in the
Archeology Museum in Paestum
In
the centuries after the fall of the Roman empire, Paestum
was also invaded by nature, which turned the plain into an
on-again, off-again swamp. It was even overrun by Saracens, the fierce Muslim
pirates from the south who raided along these coasts in
the eighth and ninth centuries AD. Truly, the site must
have been mysterious over those centuries; it is anyone's
guess what travellers who stumbled across these ruins in
the Middle Ages must have thought. You didn't have to be
an unlettered peasant to be awed by these temples.
There is a mention of the area of
the temples in Paestum by Neapolitan humanist, Pietro Sommonte, as
early as 1524, but the great Spanish Empire, of which
Naples had become a vice-royal
appendage, was not particularly interested in
finding out about and preserving exotic and little-known
cultures. (Ask the Aztecs!) As a true archaeological site,
Paestum is scarcely a few centuries old, having been
rediscovered in the early 1700s along with Pompeii, Herculaneum and so many other
relics of Classical Italy. Yet Paestum was more
interesting to many in the mid 1700s than those two famous
examples of rediscovered Rome right next door on the
slopes of Vesuvius.
Even back then, people knew what Pompeii and Herculaneum had been, even if modern archaeology had not yet arrived on the scene, but Paestum was special and mysterious. The first maps of the site appear in 1732, and between 1734-40, with the new Bourbon dynasty under King Culture, himself, Charles III, firmly in charge of the Kingdom of Naples, an entire set of drawings of Paestum was published. By the 1750s, Grand Tourists were on to the place. Numerous English “amateur” archaeologists (in real life, they were “gentlemen”) were sending back lengthy accounts of the ruins of Paestum. (See: “Documents on the Greek Revival in Architecture,” by Michael McCarthy, in The Burlington Magazine, Vol. 114, No. 836. Nov. 1972, pp. 760-769.) Somewhat later Goethe waxed so Romantic over it all that he had to send back to Frankfurt for more wax.
There
was significant archaeology through the last half of
the 1700s and into the 1800s. The first restorative work
on the three large temples was done in 1805 with great
emphasis on the so-called temple of Ceres (Athenaion)
which by the early Middle Ages had been turned into a
Christian place of worship. In 1819, Father Giuseppe Bamonte,
published Le antichità pestane (Ancient Paestum)
and had the first accurate map of the layout of the
ancient city drawn up. Between 1827-29, significant damage
to the site was caused by the laying of the Lower
Tyrrhenian Road, also known as the Calabrian Road, a
section of which went right through Paestum with little
regard for ancient history. If it is any consolation, the
king was upset and had the responsible engineer, one
Roberto Petrilli, put on trial for damaging the site. (No
one seems to know what happened to Bob.)
Between
1907-22, systematic archaeology under Vittorio Spinazzola
went on at Paestum. In WWII the massive Allied invasion of
Salerno in September of 1943 caused some problems. It goes
without saying that wartime operations have other
priorities than preserving archaeological sites. The
invasion was actually a series of landings that took place
(see this link) at various
points along the whole coast of the Gulf of Salerno, from
just north of the town of Salerno, itself, to the
southern end of the gulf. All of that coastal area —all of it!— is of
archaeological interest. The US 36th infantry division
came ashore at Paestum, and, in at least one case,
archaeology came out on top. The allies decided to build
an airstrip at Gaudo, 3 km.
up the coast from Paestum. Bull-dozing uncovered some "old
stuff." One Lt. Brinson, an archaeologist in real life, realized that they
were looking at a prehistoric necropolis. It turned out to
be the ruins of what is now called the Gaudo culture. (Let's hear it
for Lt. Brinson! He apparently talked the brass into
saving the site and building the strip elsewhere. "What's that, Lieutenant?
The woods are crawlin' with Krauts—we're fighting them,
remember?—and you want me to move my air-strip because
of WHAT?!")
There is a fine modern
museum right across from the main entrance; it
contains the obvious Greek and Roman relics, but also a
considerable collection of prehistoric items from the
area. The museum was built in 1952 at a time when the
modern town of Paestum was very small and not much of an
attraction. The explosion of the tourist business in the
Gulf of Salerno in recent decades has changed all that.
There is a great deal of recent, attractive residential
housing and any number of hotels geared to tourists, who
themselves are geared to the beaches and the
archaeological site. With all that, the museum has come
into its own as a good one.
https://museopaestum.cultura.gov.it/
PARCO ARCHEOLOGICO DI PAESTUM & VELIA
Via Magna Grecia, 919 –
84047
Capaccio Paestum (SA)
Tel. 0828 81 10
23
email:
pa-paeve@cultura.gov.it
==========================added
Feb 16, 2023=================================
Cleaning up Antiquity
Not pristine, but clean and spiffy isn't
bad
Newspaper accounts
assure us that this is "programmed maintenance" of the
three Greek temples at the Paestum archeological site. I
think this is within the purview of Gabriele Zuchtriegel,
director of the Pompei Archeological site, which also
includes nearby Herculaneum and Oplontis. If so, he will
handle it properly and we can relax. This isn't
restoration. This is maintenance. After all, the structure
you see here was built 500 years BC. In this photo, they
have used a small mobile crane to get workers up there to
clean away weeds and grass. If you didn't do that, the
whole structure would be overgrown with vegetation in a
short time. We don't think about it that much, but what do
we want to see from a building that is 2,500 years old?
Perhaps "clean antiquity". We want to
indulge our sense of history, but we don't want to get
dirty. (Read this entire page from the top
for more.)
photo credit, above - la Repubblica
UNESCO has its own
classification system for its World History sites. Paestum
is part of their #842 page
here.
Paestum is a part of the "Cilento and Vallo di Diano
National Park with the Archeological Sites of Paestum
and Velia, and the Certosa di Padula". (This seems
top-heavy to me, but it's is a very rich area.) They are
all in the same general area as
Pompeii and Herculaneum. Should everything be in one very
big grab-bag of ancient sites? I don't think so; it's
already
unwieldy. But if you're down here for a short time,
stretch that time as much as possible. Don't miss this
one.
===================added April 2023==========================
New Discoveries
at Paestum's 'Little
Temple'
The vast site, with those
three massive structures, overwhelms the eye and
tempts the visitor to treat anything called "little"
as barely worth looking at. (The
'little temple' is from the
diminutive tempietto in Italian).
Yet there were other temples here and
the "little" one discovered in 2019 near the ruins of the
walls of the ancient Greek city of Paestum is very
significant. But where is it, you ask? It's gone. In one
sense, yes, it is gone. But it's still there in
the mind's eye of archaeologists with shovels and good
boots — nothing really too
fancy. You need researchers with a lot of time and
questions. They want to spitball this thing until it gives
up some answers. "They put it right near the water"; "I
wonder if this was the first place they stopped"; "Maybe
this was the first temple dedicated to Poseidon"; "Look,
there's another column. That makes four. Keep going. Hey,
hand me the ice-chest."
Everyone taking part in these newest finds
says what they have come across will 'change recorded
history', i.e. give us new information on this city and
how it was related to other cities in Italian Magna Grecia
and even to the parent city-states of Greece, the
colonizers who sent these settlers out in the first place.
Analysis of clay decorations dates the foundation of the
"little temple" to the first quarter of the fifth century
BC, a bit before some of the important large
temples that are still with us today were built. This
smaller structure measures 15.6 meters by 7.5 meters, with
four columns at the front and seven on the sides. That is
not small, just a bit small-ER. It is a look at
the time the temple was abandoned, between the end of the
second century BC and the start of the first, before the
colossal ones were built.
What might we
learn? For example, more about their religious practices;
or, Were the people architectural copy-cats or did they
have ideas of their own? Preliminary finds include a
terracotta figurine of Eros (known to the Romans as Cupid,
the god of desire) riding a dolphin, seven bull heads, a
fine sculpture of Aphrodite (known to the Romans as Venus,
the goddess of love, and an altar (image, left) with
grooves in the stones to collect sacrificial liquids (I'm
guessing animal blood, not human. (Now that would
be a colossal find! I'm joking, I hope.) In any event,
there's a surprise every day. There is a lot of work to do
here. A lot of questions. Maybe some answers. If you have
a back that's strong and a mind that's also strong, show
up with a shovel. This is important.