The Secret Room (il Gabinetto segreto)
(Greek & Roman pornography)
I once asked a tour
guide at Pompeii to compare the apotropaic semiology*1 of Roman erotic
art and similar erotica in the Indian Kama Sutra or the
Northern European Sheela Na Gig.
*2 He leered and
said, "Pssst! Hey, pal, wanna see some dirty
pictures?"
OK, that didn't happen. But it was close. I was at Pompeii
with my wife and her father. The guide, with no prompting
on my part, asked her father and me if we wanted to look
at some "secret mosaics." He unlocked what looked like a
medicine cabinet of the kind you find in home bathrooms.
It was mounted flush against a small section of an ancient
Roman wall covered with frescoes. The cabinet had no back,
such that when you opened the front of the cabinet you saw
a "secret" mosaic on the wall. In this case, the mosaic
was of an ancient Roman happily grinning while weighing
his genitalia on a hand-held scale. When my wife tried to
sneak a peek, the guide closed the cabinet and said that
"women are not allowed to view such things." My wife
rolled her eyes the way women do when dealing with adult
male children.
I was reminded of all this when I noted in the
newspaper yesterday that the "Gabinetto segreto" at the
National Archaeological museum has been reopened to the
public. That is the room where various bits of ancient
Greek and Roman erotic art are on display, from the
mythological —a Roman copy of an original Greek statue by
Heliodorus of Pan teaching Daphnis to play the panpipes,
and the marble group of Pan copulating with a goat, found
in 1752 in the Villa of the Papyri
in Herculaneum— to various
explicit scenes of human sexual activity, sexually
explicit symbols, inscriptions and even household items
(such as phallic oil lamps). The collection includes
paintings done to adorn brothels and special rooms of
private houses. There are also small bronzes and personal
phallic amulets, worn by men and women as protection
against the evil eye and
illnesses; there is a bronze Etruscan mirror with an
engraved erotic scene and a series of small dwarves in
stone with enormous phalluses in their hands, of Egyptian
provenance and dating to the Ptolemaic period.
The History of the Collection at the entrance says
this:
From Renaissance
times, collections of "obscene" objects were
considered a worthy feature of any collector's display
of relics from antiquity. Sometimes they were kept
under lock and key, or else— as in the "garden
of Love in the Villa della Farnesina overlooking the
Tiber—they were cunningly presented in a
decorous context (e.g. Pan and Daphne: inv. 6327, in
the Farnese collection).
Statues, items of jewelry, oil lamps and miniature
paintings adorned with erotic subjects were prized by
aristocratic collectors; they were a source of
artistic inspiration (Mosaic with Pan and nymph: inv.
27708), literary erudition—clarifying ancient
authors' allusions to sexuality—or simple
prurient curiosity.
The excavation of Pompeii and Herculaneum in the
mid-18th century brought to light a large amount of
new material, revealing an aspect of the ancient world
that caused no little embarrassment. Contemporary
wisdom took the Roman Empire as the ethical paradigm
for all subsequent governments. The two medium-sized
towns that were being unearthed at the foot of
Vesuvius had nothing in common in socio-economic
terms, with those notorious "dens of iniquity" Capri
and Baiae. Yet sex emerged in the Vesuvian towns as an
important element of daily life, displayed not merely
without false modesty, but with a candour and
naturalness that caused consternation.
The most enlightened contemporary scholars set about
serious study of these finds, but all too soon the
reconstruction of the ancients' attitude to sexuality
fell foul of Bourbon censorship. This was not simply a
question of bigotry: the foreigners visiting Naples on
the Grand Tour tended to indulge in ribaldry whenever
the collection was mentioned, and their comments could
be decidedly defamatory with respect to life and
morals in the Kingdom of Naples. Thus the statue of
Pan and the goat from the Villa of the Papyri in
Herculaneum was simply locked away in a cupboard by
restorer Canart, whereas in the Royal Museum of
Portici the "Priapuses" were put in a separate room,
Sala XVIII, requiring a special permit.
At time went by the censorship proved to be
counter-productive, for it roused curiosity and
resulted in the myth, which regrettably lingers on
even today, of Pompeii as a dissolute and libertine
place, "given over to the most sordid debauchery so
that, like Sodom, it brought down divine punishment
and was consumed by fire." The collection was
segregated once again during the Restoration: in 1819
the heir to the throne, who reigned as Francesco I
from 1825 to 1830, visited the Museum with his wife
Maria Isabella and daughter Luisa Carlotto. He was of
the opinion that "it would be as well to confine all
the obscene objects of whatever material in one room,
the only people allowed to visit this room being of
mature age and proven morality." Thus the Royal
Bourbon Museum officially instituted the "Cabinet of
obscene objects", originally to contain the
"disreputable monuments of pagan licentiousness", but
which later came to harbour even works from modern
times such as Titian's "Danae".
In spite of its segregation, the fame of the
collection grew throughout the 19th century, as we
learn from the number of visitors' permits issued by
the Ministry of the Interior. It was not long before
these permits had to be printed to keep up with the
demand, and needless to say there were complaints
about delays, salacious witticisms and also ploys to
circumvent the system. The way in which the collection
was administered became a symbol of the cultural
backwardness of the Bourbon regime, and both the
revolutionaries of 1848 and Garibaldi's forces in 1860
pledged to reopen the Cabinet as an assertion of
liberty.
Following the Unification of Italy the director of the
Museum, Giuseppe Fiorelli, removed many of the objects
from the Cabinet and reaffirmed the importance of the
collection as a palaeo-anthropological record of
sexuality. Indeed, in view of the fact that the
purchases continued to be made, such as an ancient
mosaic portraying pygmies bought in Rome in 1894, it
was obviously intended as a national collection. At
the same time, however, access was once again
restricted, a state of affairs that continued
throughout the first half of the 20th century and even
following the Second World War. It was reopened in
1976, but then closed again to allow comprehensive
restoration of the rooms. It was finally put on public
view once more in April 2000, above all as a
show-piece of museographical history.
The Gabinetto
Segreto, in spite of the last sentence in the above
bit of museum literature, has been closed more than it has
been open in the last ten years, for whatever reason. It
is, however, now, definitively open to the general public.
The Secret Room is relatively small but packed with items;
there are separate sections with explanations in Italian
and English for Pre-Roman items, Decorations in Boudours
and Brothels, Amulets and Miscellaneous Items, Paintings,
Erotic Objects from the Borgia Collection (acquired in
1815), plus various phallic symbols decorating the walls.
(For purposes of illustrating this entry and to protect
your genteel sensitivities —not to mention my own— I have
chosen the tamest and most delicately erotic items I could
find. You may wish to take that into consideration before
dragging the kids through this exhibit.)
notes: 1. Just
kidding. ^back
to text 2. Not kidding here. I assume you
know about the Kama Sutra. TheSheela Na
Gig are naked female figures on churches, walls, and
towers, primarily in Ireland, Northern Ireland,
Scotland, Wales, and England. ^ back to text