The star of the
1953 science fiction movie, Donovan's
Brain, is, as you might expect,
a brain, kept alive and bubbling in a
chemical solution. There was also a
1959 stinker entitled The Brain
That Wouldn't Die. You see, this
young surgeon saves the head of his
fiancee, who has just died, and, well,
I don't want to spoil it for you. Then
there was the one about Hitler's
disembodied brain (although, as I
recall, it did have a mustache)
telepathically hatching a Fourth
Reich. I forget the name of that one,
but it was the worst movie ever made.
(Tough competition comes from Jesse
James Meets Frankenstein's Daughter,
a 1966 epic, the clean yet stark
honesty of which is spoiled only by
the plot: the mad baron's daughter
holes up in a secret laboratory in
Mexico where she has brought her
father's brain to find a body
transplant. The famous gunfighter
shows up and, well, to make a long
story short, since then ol' Jess has
planted lots of mighty tough hombres
in boot hill just for making fun of
those electrodes sticking out of his
head.
All this is nothing new;
detached cerebra, usually evil, have been
turning B-movie fans' own brains into mush for
decades. But even in real life, part of
Mussolini's brain actually did wind up in the
hands of some American doctors who thought
there might be something to be learned from
analyzing dictatorial gray matter. I hear that
Einstein's brain, too, underwent analysis;
here, they were apparently looking for a part
stamped "Genius. For easy removal and
transplant, follow these simple instructions."
Life imitates bad art, I guess.
Brains? Fine. There may be
some scientific, albeit misguided, striving
behind all that. I'm not so sure, however,
about other detached organs. Well, not just
any organ. I have just searched my Who's
Who & What's What in Science Fiction
Film, Television, Radio & Theater
Fact-Packed A-Z Encyclopedia for any
reference to a film about an item I've just
seen in the newspapers. Thank goodness, I've
found nothing. Not yet, anyway. It had to do with the fate of
Napoleon's mummified penis. It was discovered
in a private collection in Manhattan recently
and now there is a great debate going on about
whether to return it to the French or put it
on display! That's right, on display after,
look, I'm just reporting this... giving it a
dignified bronzing!
The search for the missing
imperial penis was the leitmotiv of a
recent novel, Peter Doyle, by John
Vernon. Also, its wanderings from auction
block to private collection have enlivened the
pages of the New York Times literary
supplement and the Columbia University Alumni
review recently. It's a big thing. The
discussion.
At the moment, it is in
the hands (metaphorically, of course) of Dr.
John Lattimer of the Squire Urological Clinic
in New York. He picked it up (more metaphor)
from a private collection in New Jersey. That
collector, says Lattimer, got it from a French
monk. Now, the good doctor is trying to defend
his right to hold on to it (I know, I know).
William Colby, ex-CIA guy, has called the
affair "obscene" and has demanded that
Lattimer return it to France. The New York
Times has called Colby a "puritan" and
has come out in favor of keeping and bronzing
the little piece of the Little Corporal.
How did all this come
to pass, anyway? After Napoleon's death in
prison on Saint Helena in 1821, his body was
moved to Paris for burial. "It" was missing,
apparently amputated by the doctor who was at
the Emperor's deathbed. It was the last bit of
humiliation they could inflict on him. Well, it's not the
ultimate humiliation. As noted, someone has
already written the novel. And you know
Hollywood: "Lights, camera, action; ok, cue
the... uh, well, you know."